PS3 games online tournaments and events with regular competitions and Leaderboards

#1 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 16:03

What you prefer Third person shooters or First person shooters??

**TheBigTen-Ghost** · #2 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 16:22

STaCKeDDD_x2 · #3 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 16:37

Third person is the lamest thing ever... I dont understand how/why games keep coming out in Third Person only either...

Its a joke, i'd play SOCOM if it wasnt for gay ass third person, i'd get a 360 and prolly plays GOW cuz lets face it... even in third person that game is still tight... But if it was FP i'd def be rocking a gaybox.

Captain_Planet · #4 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 16:48

Too much camping in TPS.

#5 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 16:59

I think TPS are much better. you see more and there 9/10 times a cover mode. FPS are good i just prefer TPS.

Captain_Planet · #6 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 17:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperManXLII

I think TPS are much better. you see more and there 9/10 times a cover mode. FPS are good i just prefer TPS.

No shit. That is why each game is full of campers.

Mc_Stiff · #7 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 17:07

should b third person for d movement and first person for shooting...........Best of Both

#8 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 17:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain_Planet

No shit. That is why each game is full of campers.

lool. conered me . good point. what about vegas the camping in that was ... just a black day in gaming history .

flagstealer · #9 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 19:33

FPS by a long shot

**XxMetalGearxX** · #10 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 21:25

FPS. for sure. I played socom on ps2. Ill just say i will NEVER play that game again.

xMrFoxhoundx · #11 (**permalink**) February 26th, 2008, 22:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by XxMetalGearxX

FPS. for sure. I played socom on ps2. Ill just say i will NEVER play that game again.

Cool thing about MGO was it was TPS BUT you had to go into FPS for accurate or far-off shots. Auto-locking noobs got demolished & it prevented camping 80% of the time.

FPS>TPS but TPS+FPS FTW

**D-MALE-** · #12 (**permalink**) February 27th, 2008, 16:35

well it depends really, CoD would blow in TPS, but GoW would suck in FPS. normally i like FPS because its more realistic.

xMrFoxhoundx · #13 (**permalink**) February 27th, 2008, 18:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by D-MALE-

well it depends really, CoD would blow in TPS, but GoW would suck in FPS. normally i like FPS because its more realistic.

Yeah, some games can pull off 3rd and some can't. FPS is normally better.

Newt15 · #14 (**permalink**) March 1st, 2008, 11:49

FPS but TPS still own

MercinarySniper · #15 (**permalink**) March 6th, 2008, 15:58

First person shooter by far.

CaptLimpwrist · #16 (**permalink**) March 6th, 2008, 16:34

I'm the minority I suppose. I like TPS more because I can actually use cover.... which is the real reason games come in TPS. FPS if you're behind cover, you'd be blind. Most FPS's aren't meant for thought or strategy though, so it never matters with them.

Pyrifax · #17 (**permalink**) March 6th, 2008, 18:43

Has to be FPS, I can never get a good grasp on a TPS, I suck at shooting and all that shit.

FPS all the way.

#18 (**permalink**) March 7th, 2008, 04:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptLimpwrist

I'm the minority I suppose. I like TPS more because I can actually use cover.... which is the real reason games come in TPS. FPS if you're behind cover, you'd be blind. Most FPS's aren't meant for thought or strategy though, so it never matters with them.

True i prefer tps aswell coz of the cover system. im killzone2 has cover and its all done in fps and from what i have seen its quite decent.fps u have the sprint system which looks better. overall tps wins for me.