cod3 v cod4

[BoDY_RoCK]

Originally Posted by RoostA-

herm,the way you like cod3,you wouldve loved cod2.........i wish ya'll couldve played it.............and you know how every1 stresses cod3 took skill..................cod2 took ten times more skill to be good at it then cod3...................as for cod4 my 7 year ol daughter goes positive so that tells it all for cod4........<---noob friendly.........

OMG did cod2 ever take skill....

that game was so hard to be good at

no gun was a guarantee kill unless you were already good at the game and knew what you were doing. roosta can you imagine cod2 on the ps3 with stats and better graphics

dude imagine Town Square Maubage Gela all with cod4 grphics and no glitches

Call Of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.

This game is best in the series by far. Literally has everything you need. Mic support, great online play,best rank up system to-date. This game is the best of the series.

I played Call Of Duty 3, there's nothing special.

[xXAirborneXx]

Rank up system is stupidest ****ing thing ive ever seen. Yah lets repeat the same ****ing ranks a zillion times and reunlock everything. I mean cmon wtf are they ****ing retarded??!?!

cod3 is basic, thats all you need. The players made cod3 fun. All the good people knew eachother and played with eachother. cod4 has about the entire world playing it making it really gay. Was fun joining rooms of people you knew and not getting 20 invites every 10 mins in cod4.


add all the fancy shit to a game,mic support, ranks,ect, it doesn't make gameplay good. Cod4 gameplay is in no way bad, just comparing it to cod3 gameplay it blows.

How those CoD3 gameplay live up to CoD4 ? I have seen videos of battles on CoD3 and I have played it myself. There isn't much special about this game. I mean the game is dry but it doesn't suck. It's just not a skillful game .

Rank up system, mic support fall under gameplay. Thats why CoD was the highest rated shooter in 2007, because it had good gameplay.

[BigLeagueCHU]

I seriously would like to see one person that thinks CoD3 takes less skill then
CoD4...

You say CoD4 is just run and blaze someone with a whole clip, GTFO. It takes some skill to be in CQB and with controlled burst on your gun and still take the guy down, who is using a LMG. Thats skill.

[BLUEIRON]

Originally Posted by NiKeMaN

How those CoD3 gameplay live up to CoD4 ? I have seen videos of battles on CoD3 and I have played it myself. There isn't much special about this game. I mean the game is dry but it doesn't suck. It's just not a skillful game .

Rank up system, mic support fall under gameplay. Thats why CoD was the highest rated shooter in 2007, because it had good gameplay.

If youre seriously saying Cod3 isnt a skillfull game then you havnt played it! It doesnt make sense to say cod4 takes more skill! How can you say that? I know guys who have 2.0 kds on cod4 and werent even good enough to play in cod3 clans! You cant absorb bullets in cod3, if you miss youre dead, you dont get radars, airstrikes or helicopters! Explain how youve came to your conclusion Abe!

Yeah I am seriously saying it.

Firstly, why are you trying to judge someone's opinion ?

Secondly, I have played CoD3, other I wouldn't of posted in the thread. You can't say CoD3 is skillful because of no mic support, no radars or air strikes and shit. To be honest you are going to put a Modern Air strike into a WWII game ?

How I came to my conclusion ?. I'll answer it.I came to my conclusion after,playing CoD3 for sometime and CoD4 I found CoD4 more intense, better in gameplay and overall. I mean if you don't like killing someone through cover with an M4 Carbine and rather have to run round the back kill two other guys who are there before killing your designated target , then somethings wrong.

[BLUEIRON]

Im not judging your opinion, Im simply asking you what is more skillfull about cod4? every aspect of skill in cod4 was also in cod3, just cod3 took real skill to use the weapons whereas cod4 weapons are much easier to master, also id like to mention that camping was near impossible in cod3.

Whatever, I think CoD4 is best shooter so far, you like CoD3. Nice to know.

[J-CoReY-55]

Originally Posted by REAPER_DESTROY

what game do you think is better

see heres the thing why people dont like cod4
1.How hard is Cod3 when half the people that played it dont play anymore.
2.They always get owned when they play cod4 cause you cant just rush everytime
3.Cod3 isnt hard to beat anyone you could no scope with a sniper thompson you cant beat much of the guns are similar like how is a scoped kar more powerful than a kar the only difference is a scope. im not saying i didnt like the game but it is way easier than cod4

[BLUEIRON]

Originally Posted by J-CoReY-55

see heres the thing why people dont like cod4
1.How hard is Cod3 when half the people that played it dont play anymore.
2.They always get owned when they play cod4 cause you cant just rush everytime
3.Cod3 isnt hard to beat anyone you could no scope with a sniper thompson you cant beat much of the guns are similar like how is a scoped kar more powerful than a kar the only difference is a scope. im not saying i didnt like the game but it is way easier than cod4

Jesus loves you..

[Camaro]

Call of Duty 3.

I've played every Call of Duty game since CoD2 and I think CoD3 takes the most skill out of them all, obviously you could whore out Allies, but to those of us that raped with Axis when everyone else was n00bing it up, I salute you!

Call of Duty 4 is way too n00b friendly,

"ooo hi thar, I'm just campin wif my m16 lol"

Or my favorite: "Haha I needz moar bullitz!! Jewgernot and last stand *****!"
You get those guys with Juggerfag and fag stand, WITH a terrible connection and they're impossible to kill.
Not to mention that every game always lagged, nothing personal againt the Europeans, but jeez, we're talking a three second lag at times.

Call of Duty 2 and Big Red One I'd put right up there near CoD3 in terms of fun, but it did lag a bit and the blast radius on the grenades was like a nuke.

lol, you hear a grenade bounce near you on Big Red One and you're dead. Not to mention the grenade glitch that had people just spamming random grenades everywhere. Though sadly, Call of Duty 4 was even worse it seems in random grenades. Especially Grenade and Destroy or Domination, everyone always grenaded the tits out of Flag B.

[RoostA-]

Originally Posted by BoDY_RoCK

OMG did cod2 ever take skill....

that game was so hard to be good at

no gun was a guarantee kill unless you were already good at the game and knew what you were doing. roosta can you imagine cod2 on the ps3 with stats and better graphics

dude imagine Town Square Maubage Gela all with cod4 grphics and no glitches

hell yea.................it woulda been off the chain to have cod2 for ps3..................theres times i think bout buying a xbox just to play cod2............see how the maps look and all that.................gela,crucifix,troinia.....etc ................

[RoostA-]

Originally Posted by CamaroChevySS

Call of Duty 3.

I've played every Call of Duty game since CoD2 and I think CoD3 takes the most skill out of them all, obviously you could whore out Allies, but to those of us that raped with Axis when everyone else was n00bing it up, I salute you!

Call of Duty 4 is way too n00b friendly,

"ooo hi thar, I'm just campin wif my m16 lol"

Or my favorite: "Haha I needz moar bullitz!! Jewgernot and last stand *****!"
You get those guys with Juggerfag and fag stand, WITH a terrible connection and they're impossible to kill.
Not to mention that every game always lagged, nothing personal againt the Europeans, but jeez, we're talking a three second lag at times.

Call of Duty 2 and Big Red One I'd put right up there near CoD3 in terms of fun, but it did lag a bit and the blast radius on the grenades was like a nuke.

lol, you hear a grenade bounce near you on Big Red One and you're dead. Not to mention the grenade glitch that had people just spamming random grenades everywhere. Though sadly, Call of Duty 4 was even worse it seems in random grenades. Especially Grenade and Destroy or Domination, everyone always grenaded the tits out of Flag B.

sorry man i disagree with that statment...................cod3 to me,was a cake walk compared to cod2.................as for the clans on cod2,there will never be real hardcore competiton like that again..............never.......cod2 you can change your name every time b4 you sighn online,also when you make your own room on cod2, you couldve named your room anything you wanted............example 'YA'LL BLOW'.............town square.............as for the lag,there was twice as much on cod3,omg and cod3 ps2 just blew cow ballz it lagged so bad, when you would get 12 players in the room all the mics would lag out to static................couldnt hear chit...................cod3 ps3 just had more detail..........but still lagged more then cod2................

[Camaro]

The only reason I liked CoD3 more was because the grenades weren't nukes, you couldn't spam grenades everywhere(grenade glitch in CoD2, I didn't start playing CoD2 until after CoD3, but I did like it a lot, my favorite map would probably be Town Square, a lot of glitches and all, but it still is pretty fun.

There's just something about CoD3 that always makes it the most fun I've ever had, clan battles usually weren't gay like CoD4 and people you could always have fun on it.

[RoostA-]

yea i loved how we set up cb's on COD2. you would just make a room,EXAMPLE..............FyC WANTS 4VS4..............then you just sit in your room wait for the clans to come in and say lets battle...........also the guns where nice........i hope they bring m1 carbine back for cod5..............m1 carbine allowed you to generate health packs!!!!!!!!! lol you kill some one your hurt,just turn the corner and drop a health pack to yourself,ha you never die....................also the mp44 shot like the bar does on cod3..........probbaly even better..............